Aim of al-Gore’s global warming – frying our freedoms
JULY 18 - For those of you who think al-Gore’s propaganda film, “An Inconvenient Truth”, was the big kick-off of his Global Warming crusade, you’re at least a decade or more off the mark.
In September of 1992, at the height of the initial Slick Willie/al-Gore run for the White House, syndicated columnist and TV panelist George Will, wrote a column declaring that Gore’s then recently published book, Earth in the Balance, “is a powerful reason not to elect him to high office”, and, “clearly is wastebasket worthy.”
In his wastebasket wanderings, Will said the then vice-presidential candidate, “labeled our civilization a dysfunctional family, favored a wrenching transformation of society, and the altering of the very foundation of our civilization.” Is this nut anti-American or what?
What’s with these Dem candidates with their “change” everything campaigns?
Will was appalled at Gore’s false claim in his wastebasket tome that the world scientific community is in consensus about global warming, when he knew that his former Harvard mentor, Roger Revelle, who died just a year earlier, had stated that the scientific base for global warming was too uncertain at that time to justify drastic action.
Will also points out that a widely publicized Gallup Poll of scientists in global science research showed that 53 percent did not believe warming has occurred, and another 30 percent were uncertain.
Not surprisingly, some 12 years later, the February 2004 issue of Environment and Climate News, contained an article by S. Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia, debunking virtually all of the global warming nonsense.
Singer states that, “ weather satellites measuring atmospheric temperatures day in and day out from pole to pole,” report only a minute rise that extrapolates to about a half-a-degree Centigrade by the year 2100.” (emphasis mine).
Singer also wrote that economist say that a moderate warming would be better for the economy and lead to a higher GNP and higher living standards worldwide.
What’s more important and fatal to the Gore gobbledegook on the warming source is the fact that carbon dioxide (CO2) is not a pollutant, but an essential component of our atmosphere. Combined with sunshine and trace ingredients, Singer wrote, plants turn CO2 into food and fiber – the more CO2 (carbon footprint), the better growth of crops and trees.
Professor Singer is also president of the non-profit Science and Environmental Policy Project in Arlington, Virginia.
Columnist Will put his finger directly on the al-Gore motivation for this unsubstantiated insanity which has been expanded to include an attack on the U.S. economy with carbon footprints, greenhouse gas, holes in the ozone and other traditional terror tactics aimed at frightening the ill informed.
Will wrote in 1992, “Gore, who has spent most of his life in Washington’s governing circle, overflows with the central characteristics of that circle. He knows the future and knows exactly what it requires; which turns out to be an unprecedented expansion of government – spending, regulating, evaluating technologies and transferring wealth abroad.”
If that doesn’t describe the primary thrust of our (uh, their) government for the past 16 years, I’ve got a hole in my ozone!
In typical big government self-esteem, this class of buffoons, who fail at education programs, budget balancing, superstructure maintenance, medical care, border control, energy supply, etc., etc., wants to go global.
It only figures that the carbon footprint promoter owns a mansion in Tennessee that uses 20 times the energy of the average U.S. home, and he follows in the footsteps of his late U.S. Senator father in utilizing energy schemes for personal gain.
The mansion and fortune his father created were derived from oil deal participation with J. Paul Getty and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics during the Cold War. If you’ve been wondering how the Democrat pols got so anti-drilling, anti-nuclear plants, anti-gas and anti-coal development on U.S. soil for the past three decades or more, the transition from Cold War to “Warming War” might shed some light.
A prime illustration of al-Gore’s true beneficence and charity toward needy Americans was revealed in his 1995 income tax return. On a gross income exceeding $500,000, his contributions to charity were $400. Now, that’s an Inconvenient Truth!
It’s amazing that George Will’s analysis of al-Gore 16 years ago, can be shifted virtually intact to Barrack Hussein Obama (Change?) to describe another destroyer posing as a would-be and totally unnecessary messiah in the “Gore footprint”.
“But what is dismaying,” Will concluded, “ is the way he trades in ideas, uncritically embracing extremisms that seem to justify vast expansions of his righteousness and of the power of the government he seeks to lead”
“Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing,
but inwardly they are ravening wolves.” Matthew 7: 15.
Left says Harvard’s Business School dumb, Harvard Law smart
JULY 11—After President Bush met recently with a small group of opinion writers, conservative-leaning Kathleen Parker wrote that, “Despite his insistence that ‘he is sprinting toward the finish’, Bush seems weary, if also characteristically optimistic. “Is he completely out of touch with reality, as Bush-bashers insist? Or, does he know something the rest of us don’t?”
Based on the evolving successes in Iraq, the complete prevention of terrorists’ attacks in the U.S. since 9/11 and the Dems’ nomination of the emptiest suit to ever run for president, I would say Parker’s last question was the right one.
Also, her observation that he was ‘characteristically optimistic”, certainly fits a man with a winning record throughout his life. Quite the opposite of Jimmy Carter’s “ennui” years and “Sexy Willie’s” distracted foul-up of the first World Trade Center hit that set up the 9/11 tragedy and his tainted terms.
As I have stated previously, the drive-by, leftist media choose to ignore a Harvard Business School degree capability, the smarts to reverse a losing Texas Rangers ball club’s fortunes, success in the wildcat oil drilling field, and two highly successful terms as governor of our third most populous state.
A sidebar would be the capability to fly a supersonic jet fighter plane for the Texas Air National Guard; a feat which less than a tiny fraction of our population is capable of duplicating. In comparing reaction time required, jet pilot Bush exceeded John Kerry’s “Swift Boat’s” top speed as he was taxiing to the runway.
While, the Dems and their media stooges have spent almost five years trying to force a defeat in Iraq, Bush’s unwavering support in what would be a classic Harvard B. School case study, is producing the first Mid-east democracy outside of Israel.
Iraq is back to full oil production, a working parliament and restored diplomatic relations with former alienated nations such as Jordan and Kuwait, among others. And just last week, the United Arab Emirates forgave Iraq $8.5 billion in foreign aid debt.
Although, the Dems and their media pals have tried to paint the Iraqi transition from Saddam Hussein’s tyranny to a free government as a long, impossible dead end, by comparison to our own 14 years of dispute between revolt against England and the finalizing of the Constitution, the five years of Iraqi transition, fraught with religious disputes and al-Qaeda terrorism, has been miraculously swift by any historical standards.
In more recent times, from the defeat of Nazi Germany to the fall of the Berlin Wall and reunification of a free German Republic took 45 years, with U.S troops in constant occupation and countering communist aggression, it engaged the policies and actions of eight U.S. presidents – four Democrats and four Republicans. It was the U.S.’ tenacity, funding and vision that held on for decades and finally brought freedom to both Eastern and Western Europe and an end to the Cold War
And, this was after a worldwide “hot war” that produced 291,551 U.S. battle deaths and 670,846 wounded in three-and-a-half years. Consider that after 5 years, U.S. battle deaths are 3,352 in Iraq and 468 in Afghanistan. But, the seed of freedom is sprouting in the Islamic world.
When it comes to the transition of nations from tyranny to freedom, the American public has got to stop buying the fast-food concepts of Dems and their uneducated, uncaring media mates.
One of the biggest attacks on President Bush since Hussein was ousted and al-Qaeda initiated their murder campaigns, claims that he lied about the necessity for the war based on evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Our friends on the left have consistently ignored the claims of Bill Clinton in 1998 and 1999 of intelligence reports on Hussein’s mass-destruction weapons caches and which were passed on to the Bush administration. Also ignored were the verified air- surveillance reports of long truck convoys from Iraq into Syria in the weeks preceding Operation Iraqi Freedom.
I’m sure that last year’s Israeli air attack on Syrian targets had something to do with those convoys as well as North Korean nuclear work in that region. Hussein’s record of gassing thousands of Kurdish civilians certainly affirms his reputation of being a possessor of weapons of mass destruction. I mean, how many thousands do the Dems consider as mass?!
If anyone recalls the Joe Wilson-Valerie Plame Game, whereby another distraction was created to hide Hussein’s purchase of yellowcake from Africa’s Niger, it was confirmed this week.
A report by the Associated Press stated: “The last major remnant of Saddam Hussein’s nuclear program – a huge stockpile of concentrated natural uranium – reached a Canadian port Saturday (July 5) to complete a secret U.S. operation that included a two-week airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing two oceans.
“The removal of about 600 TONS (Emphasis mine) of yellowcake – the seed material for high-grade nuclear enrichment - was a significant step toward closing the books on Saddam’s nuclear legacy.”
Combine this with the massive truck convoys to Syria, Iran’s refusal to stop nuclear bomb development and their unending pledge to destroy Israel and the “Great Satan” – America, and what do you determine about Barack Hussein Obama’s opposition to our moves against Saddam Hussein from the get-go.
Now, who has the answers here – the Harvard Law School or the Harvard Business School? – the jet fighter pilot or the gutter ball bowler? – the free world’s leader or the neighborhood organizer? – the two-term Texas governor or the Chicago pol? – the media’s messiah or the Messiah’s mediator?
“A prudent man concealeth knowledge: but the heart of fools proclaimeth foolishness.” Proverbs: 12: 23.
As Cross Rises, Darwin Sinks Into The Primeval Ooze
JUNE 20 – An age-old saying that contained, in a few words, the controversy between evolution and creationism, was the question, “What came first, the chicken or the egg?”
As the argument has progressed in the some 150 years since Charles Darwin set forth his poorly aging Theory of Evolution, the “Theory” has remained a theory, still lacking the scientific proof method of repeatable observation, while, Creationism has been moved by its proponents, into the realm known as ” Intelligent Design.”
As the proof of Intelligent Design (ID) continues to build, the Darwinists in control of the academic community have resorted to open warfare on their ID colleagues as exposed in the documentary film, “Expelled, No Intelligence Allowed”.
Produced by actor, pundit, economist, lecturer and lawyer Ben Stein (“Ferris Bueller’s Day Off”), the film details scientists and researchers who acknowledge the evidence for the intelligent design of life, and, as a result, have been ostracized or denied tenure strictly because of their position on ID.
Stein has been taking a barrage of hits for producing the film, which not only interviews ID proponents, but also leading opponents such as Oxford’s famed atheist Richard Dawkins.
Personally, I feel that a study of the human body and its relation to an immeasurable universe settles the matter on the side of ID without question.
Many points for the case of ID have been placed on a 40-minute DVD by Louie Giglio, director of the Passion Conferences in Atlanta. The DVD, “How Great Is Our God” is reviewed by Bob Ulrich in the June issue of Prophecy in the News magazine, and contains some startling information.
Ulrich’s review relates that the Hubble Telescope, in scanning the Whirlpool Galaxy some 31 million light years away, found a swirling, mysterious black hole in the center of the galaxy that is in the exact shape of a cross (Emphasis mine).
Incidentally, one light year at 186,000 miles per second adds up to 5.88 trillion miles. Then, you have to multiply that by 31 million to get to the Whirlpool Galaxy; and, it’s one of the closer ones.
In our own galaxy, Giglio describes other Hubble discoveries, such as the planets of Betelgeuse, Mucehpei and Canis Majoris. He relates that ”If, by comparison, Earth were a golf ball, then Betelgeuse would be the size of six Empire State buildings stacked on top of one another, Mucehpei would be the length of the Golden Gate Bridge and Canis Majoris would be the size of Mount Everest.” This would make our giant Jupiter a basketball next to them.
Now, it’s quite feasible that when all this came into existence, there could have been a “Big Bang,” but with no one except God to hear it, what would have been the purpose of a bang?”
As the old question goes, “If a tree falls in the forest with no one to hear it, is there any sound?”
It’s in the human body that Giglio really examines the wonders of ID, with God stretching out a million nerve endings from the optic center of the brain to find a million optic nerves ending in the eye.
The relatively recent discovery of DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid) is one of the clinchers of Ulrich’s review of Giglio’s DVD.
“Our bodies contain 75 trillion cells,” he writes, “and if we wanted to stack our DNA (one person’s) end to end, you could travel back and forth to the moon 170,000 times! And, all that came from one cell from mom and one cell from dad!”
Is it any wonder that the evolutionists need billions of years to construct their
science-fiction man. No wonder “slime plus time” comprises the oozy foundation of their “theory.” Of course, anything built on ooze will inevitably sink.
The final grand slam of Giglio’s DVD is the description of a substance in human bodies that is called laminin, which is a cell adhesion protein molecule. Laminin, he states, is the glue that holds us all together, similar to the rebar steel within a slab of concrete.
Laminin, which appears in our DNA trillions of times, has a molecular structure IN THE SHAPE OF A CROSS!
“And he (Jesus) is before all things, and by him all things consist.” Colossians 1: 17
Prophecy’s Associate Editor Gary Stearman explains why it is called laminin: “This fibrous protein is present between the thin plates or stacked layers of tissue, called ‘lamina’ from the Latin meaning ‘thin parallel layers.’ In English, we have the words ‘laminar’ or ‘laminate,’ meaning ‘layered.
“As an extended objective truth, the Cross has been preached the world over. But to see it as an internal truth, vital to life itself, is to bring Christ to a whole new level in human dialogue.
“Among other things, it addresses the current heated dialogue about ‘intelligent design.’ Darwin could never have envisioned the microscopic perfection that characterizes life at the cellular level.”
The next time you are asked for your ID, tell them Jesus sent you; after he made you, of course.
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him:
male and female created he them.
--Genesis 1: 27.
Columnist note: Giglio’s DVD, How Great Is Our God, can be ordered from Prophecy in the News for $14.95 plus S&H. A free bonus CD (5 songs) is included. Order # DVD 651. Call toll free order line 1-800-475-1111 and use VISA, MasterCard, Discover Card or American Express.
Holy cow! From ‘The Gipper’ to ‘The Gaffer’ in only 20 years
JUNE 13 -- If Barak Hussein Obama had to pass the standard citizenship exam, he would probably flunk. Campaigning in Oregon, he stated, “I’ve been in 57 states, I think. One left to go.”
Imagine electing a neophyte Chicago pol as U.S. president who thinks the country is comprised of 58 states. You think Ronald Reagan knew that there were 50 states when elected president in 1980.
Of course, it only follows that this Columbia U. and Harvard Law grad, and junior Senator from Illinois, thinks the Senate passes bills on the majority vote out of 116 Senators.
When we characterized the courage and will power of Reagan by nicknaming him “The Gipper” for his movie role of the Notre Dame gridiron great, George Gipp, little did we realize that we might have to continue the custom with “The Gaffer” for Obama. He’s beginning to make Jimmy “The Wimp” Carter look like Thomas Jefferson.
Next thing you know, he’ll be campaigning in Canada, Bermuda or Iceland as part of “The 58”. Geography and U.S History, obviously are not strong suits of The Rev. Wright disciple, Tony Rezko sidekick or buddy of mad bomber and Underground Weatherman William Ayers.
When he was in Sunrise, Florida, he greeted the folks with, “How’s it going in Sunshine?”
He defended his defeat by Hillary in Kentucky with the claim that “I’m not very well known in that part of the country. Senator Clinton is much better known , I think, coming from a nearby state of Arkansas.”
Hello, Barry. Kentucky abuts your home state of Illinois on its southern border, and is a lot closer than Arkansas.
“The Gaffer” started early in his campaign, in May 2007, citing that recent tornadoes in Kansas killed 10,000 people: actual count, 12 people.
In Rush Limbaugh’s hometown of Cape Giradeau, Mo., last month, he decried the shortage of U.S. Army Arabic translators in Afghanistan because of heavy deployment in Iraq. Obama, they don’t speak Arabic in Afghanistan.
Remember years ago when Republican Dan Quayle spelled potato as “potatoe” . The leftist, liberal, looney media carried on for months, mashing it, baking it, French-frying it ad um infinitum, yet, there’s barely a peep from them about The Gaffer’s unending, stupid, uninformed attempts at coherence and knowledge whenever he dares to stray from the scripted “Change” and “Hope” meaningless malarkey message. This was highlighted when Limbaugh matched Obama’s ” Change” speech almost flawlessly to a speech by “DEM-agogue” Mario Cuomo some 30 years ago. I suppose going backward is a change to leftist idiots.
No wonder he reacted so vehemently against President Bush’s criticism of appeasement such as the Chamberlain/Hitler farce in the 1930s that led to WW II.. The past is the communist time of triumph with Marx and Lenin, and it’s where they want to bring us again; this time, using green instead of red.
On that score, locally, he told The Orlando Sentinel that he would meet with communist dictator wannabe, Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, to discuss “his fermentation of anti-American sentiment in Latin America, his support of commie FARC terrorists in Colombia and other issues he (Chavez) would want to talk about.
The next day, closer to the problem down in Miami, he took a hard stance (obviously sucking up to a more Latin audience) he demanded that countries supporting FARC (Chavez gave them $200 million plus arms) should be subject to “regional isolation”.
Hugo must think his Marxist pal Obama is a shoo-in for U.S. president, as he changed his tone and script on cue, denouncing FARC and any other terrorist (he said, “rebellious”) groups in South America just last week; at least until after the first Tuesday in November.
The most ludicrous aspect of this “58-stater”, who obviously can’t count, is his pretended belief that we’re in a recession.
Actually, since the recovery started in 2001, every quarter, including the last two, has posted economic growth. The recent unemployment figures for May, show a small increase from 5 percent to 5.5 percent, which is still virtually full employment to the rest of the world, and half of “The Wimp” Carter’s 11 percent. This is the month when students flood the market and cause a slight bump.
The Gaffer wants to wants to repeat the worst presidency in modern history using The Wimp’s “malaise” methodology of high taxes and entitlement expansion that produced 12 percent annual inflation, 18 to 21 percent first mortgage rates and mile-long lines at the gas pumps. Not to mention the real Obama/Wright/Ayers goal; a repeat of communist expansion worldwide under the “Jimmy Jabber” pretending to be foreign policy.
Obama’s intention to quickly eliminate the Bush tax cuts will, he “Hopes”, have dire consequences on our economy. Please note that from 2003 to 2007, in constant dollars, total U.S. Treasury revenue increased 20 percent (Emphasis mine).
Both Iraq and Afghanistan have made tremendous progress and there was a huge sideline benefit always forgotten by the Dems and their lapdog press pals.
When we plowed Saddam Hussein under in six weeks, it knocked some common sense into Col. Muammar (Pan Am 103) al-Quaddafi of Mid-east troublemaker Libya. Almost immediately, Libya announced it would stop all biological, chemical and nuclear weapons development, opened up to inspectors and signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. How’s that for a policy of no talking with terrorist leaders, Barry?
Obama labels a McCain presidency as a Bush third term. Yea, man! Bring it on!
Better than a second term for The Wimp, or worse still, Nikita Krushchev.
“He that troubleth his own house shall inherit the wind: and the fool shall be the servant of the wise at heart.”
Proverbs 11: 29.
Never a Dem yellow-dog, always a Dem yellow-dog – Huh!?
MAY 16 – Did you know that the first slave-holder of a black man in the American Colonies in the mid-17th century was a black slave-holder, and the first anti-slavery protest came from a white man?
Did you know that prior to that slave, John Casor, the only type of unpaid servants in America, both black or white, male or female, were indentured servants, who committed to seven years of unpaid labor in exchange for transportation here from Europe or Africa?
Did you know that of 10,689 free blacks who lived in New Orleans in 1830, more than 3,000 of them were slave masters?
I’m embarrassed to admit that I didn’t know this, and I’m an Ivy League product with more than 50 years of added study, reading and political research. Thank the LORD, a close friend of the past two decades, the Rev. Ben Kinchlow, sent me his latest book last week, and I couldn’t put down Black Yellowdogs , which is chock full of documented, referenced facts on slavery, segregation and their source, presenting the absolute lunacy of the yellow-dog vote by black Americans for their historic Democrat persecutors.
Kinchlow, a Black American, is a minister, broadcaster, author, public speaker, known worldwide as the long-time former co-host of The 700 Club and host of the International Edition of The 700 Club as seen in over 80 countries. He is also founder and CEO of “The African-American Political Awareness Coalition” to encourage votes based on principle not party. Additionally, he is a VP and board member of Kids Against Hunger, a worldwide feeding program for starving children.
He is to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright what Ronald Reagan was to Mikhail Gorbachev, and this page turner, mind burner has enough truthful, fully documented facts to prove to even the most hard-headed yellow-dog Black voter that they have been duped , doped and deluded for almost 70 years by the Dems; robbed of their most precious possession: their votes and the futures of their children.
For instance, “According to the Tuskegee Institute figures, between the years 1882 and 1951, 4,730 people were lynched in the United States by the Ku Klux Klan – 3,437 black and 1,293 white (Emphasis mine).” The Whites lynched were primarily Republicans who were fighting for the rights of the Blacks.
It is to be noted that Democrat legislators in Congress “lynched” every anti-lynching bill, either by filibuster or committee, that were brought by Republicans in 1922, 1937 and 1940. In the presidential election of 1876, at the height of Reconstruction, there was a heavy Black voter turnout and they voted 99 percent Republican. Now, Kinchlow reports that the circa 90 percent of the Black vote is so predictable, they are no longer considered to be voters, but simply Democrat voters.
He further documents that unknown to most black Americans, the Republican Party , remaining true to its origin, facilitated most of the civil rights gains of the 1960s, with a Republican Congress passing the first Civil Rights Act since Reconstruction signed by President Dwight Eisenhower in 1957. “Ike” was the first president since Reconstruction to use federal troops to support African-American rights, beginning with the Little Rock, Ark. school desegregation.
Actually, in voting for the 1964 Civil Rights Act under Lyndon Johnson and a Dem Congress, Senate Republicans bested the Dems’ vote 82 percent to 80 percent and topped the Dems’ House vote 80 percent to 61 percent.
Similarly, in the 1964 vote for the Voting Rights Act, GOP Senators bested their Dem peers 97 percent to 74 percent with 85 to 80 percent in the House. Naturally, in all this, Al Gore’s father, then U.S. Senator from Tennessee, voted against both of these vital measures for black Americans’ equality and freedom.
Almost beyond belief, Black Americans strongly support virtually everything that Dems oppose, and that by large percentages: school prayer 80 percent, education vouchers 73 percent, faith based initiatives 74 percent, English as official language 84 percent, death penalty 64 percent.
Conversely, African-Americans oppose by large margins policies Dems initiated and promote. They oppose race-based preference (affirmative action) 86 percent, legalization of pot 75 percent, same sex marriage 71 percent; all also opposed by the Republican Party.
Kinchlow poses the quandary. “So, let me get this straight; Blacks embrace conservative values, but vote liberal values!”
When a Dem-packed Supreme Court declared the Civil Rights Act of 1875 as “unconstitutional”, it opened the door for the so-called “Redeemer” governments across the South, writes Kinchlow. “With the “redeemer” (anti-civil rights Democrat) governments firmly in place throughout the South, not one piece of civil rights legislation was passed until 1954 (under “Ike” and a Republican Congress).
“How vastly different America would have been had the Democrats provided even token support for existing legislation.:”
I have only touched the surface of a deep well of enlightenment through the myriad of historical facts that this book contains. Most important, is the Rev. Kinchlow’s conclusion after a lifetime of firsthand experience when he states, “The most dangerous citizen is not armed, but uninformed.”
This book is a must read for those who are free and who wish to ensure that freedom. It ends with Dr. Martin Luther King’s Washington speech and final words. “Thank God Almighty, we are free at last.”
“Through wisdom is an house builded; and by understanding is it established: And by knowledge shall the chambers be filled with all precious and pleasant riches.” Proverbs 24: 3 and 4
When will black Americans drop the party of segregation?
APRIL 18 - Since B. Hussein Obama and “Billary” have dropped the race bomb on us since the last round of primaries, most conservative pundits and talk radio stars have noted that in the Dems’ nomination battle, it was there all the time.
Black conservative columnist Larry Elder recently wrote, “American Blacks live in a post-slavery, post-Jim Crow world, with a thriving black middle class. We live in a country where, for the most part, hard work, focus, ability and some luck determine success. Why then, the contrived anger, negativity and finger pointing, in a country to which much of the world – if it could – would happily relocate?”
Elder quotes Booker T. Washington’s 1901 book Up From Slavery, wherein he stated, “In later years, I confess that I do not envy the white boy as I once did. I have learned that success is to be measured not so much by the position that one has reached in life, as by the obstacles which he has overcome while trying to succeed. Looked at from this standpoint, I almost reach the conclusion that often the Negro boy’s birth and connection with an unpopular race is an advantage, so far as real life is concerned” (Emphasis mine).
One of the main obstacles Washington was looking at, I’m sire, was acquiring knowledge and education in an era several decades before widespread public schooling, segregated or non-segregated.
Now, one would think that some 107 years after Washington’s masterpiece of reconciliation and forgiveness, that the race thing would be buried. And, it would have been, had not the Democrat Party wiped out the victory of the Civil War and established segregation as their unifying bond and power base.
In the April issue of The American Spectator, the CEO and founder of QubeTV and Reagan White House political director Jeffery Lord details a history of the Democrats through the mid-20th century, which, thanks to the National Education Association, never reaches the public schools of this nation or most of the liberal-controlled colleges.
In exposing the Democrats’ long history of bigotry, Lord lays the foundation that of 42 national platforms since the party’s founding, 25 defended slavery, with many others demanding loyalty to segregation or expressing hostility to the 15th Amendment (1870 – voting rights of blacks), opposing anti-lynching laws and abolition of the poll tax.
Carrying this expose’ into modern history, he states the 1924 Dems’ National Convention in New York “was so infested with Ku Klux Klansmen, it was dubbed the ‘Klan Bake.’”
Lord does a nice job on party icons Grover Cleveland, Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt, which, considering the long reign of segregation, should not come as a surprise. My only surprise is that black leaders (?) have never educated their followers as to the source of their persecution, or to the fact that the Republican Party was established primarily to fight slavery before and during the Civil War.
Lord cites just a few examples of the ways in which Dem President Cleveland in 1894 shredded the remains of the Republicans’ post-Civil War civil rights bill—as well as examples of ways in which “progressive” Woodrow Wilson implemented a government-wide segregation of the federal government. The last presidential segregationist, FDR, has the greatest list of sordid examples, including the following:
--Exclusion of large portion of blacks from Social Security coverage.
--Ignored Republican pleas to support anti-lynching legislation
--Joined Cleveland and Wilson in appointing flagrant racists and Klan members to
Supreme Court and Cabinet positions.
--Banned blacks from White House press conferences and segregated his Warm
Springs, Ga. retreat.
Not to accuse the Dems of favoritism, ten of their early 20th century platforms were anti-Chinese and “Asiatic” immigration. The cappers are that Bull Connor was a member of the Democrat National Committee “at the same time he was unleashing police dogs and fire hoses on blacks marching in Birmingham.” And, of the Klan, FDR once said that they were “among his best friends and supporters.”
You can bet the farm that one of the major objectives of NEA-controlled public education was to cover the Dems’ leading role in segregation, and their success is evident in the Dems’ garnering 90 percent of the black vote time after time.
This is tantamount to descendants of Soviet Gulag victims enthusiastically voting for communist leadership decade after decade.
As Lord sums it up, “Plainly put, the progressive history of the modern Democrat Party was purchased at the expense – the violent expense – of black America. In addition to the brutality of slavery and the inhumanity of segregation, there was the horrific violence of thousands of lynchings for which there are records only between 1882 and 1968.”
With a nightmarish, surely planned, below 50 percent national high school graduation rate, even lower for black kids, and leaders like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton selling out to the Pelosis, Schumers, Kennedys and Robert “KKK” Byrds, the chances of truth prevailing are slim to none.
Still, with the flood of knowledge and information through the Internet increasing exponentially every day, I still have hope that the words of Martin Luther King Jr. will someday come to reality – Free from the Democrats. “Free at last!”
Jesus said, “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”
- John 8: 32.
Too Many Christians Are Throwing the Word Under the Bus
APRIL 11 - I find it quite disconcerting that in all the polling about the rankings of major issues in the minds of voters, with the economy and the war on terror dominating the list, the issue most important to our Creator, the slaughter of the unborn, doesn’t even make the list.
The issue that dominated the elections in the 70s, 80s and even into the 90s, has now become a yawner, even among the Evangelicals, and, except for an occasional blurb by a conservative columnist, the silence is equal to the missing cries of some 50 million aborted babies.
It should be noted that Martin Luther King Jr. was anti-abortion, and I sincerely believe that if he were alive today, he would be among the 10 percent of blacks who vote Republican. I don’t believe he gave his life so that tens of millions of black children would never see the light of day.
Barack Hussein Obama is certainly not in line with King’s moral thinking on this topic or on the subject of same-sex marriage.
Columnist Terence Jeffrey recently reported on an Obama Sunday event in Nelsonville, Ohio, where he explained why he favors legalized abortion.
“He implicitly conceded,” Jefferson wrote, “that there is something wrong with abortion, which he said has ‘a moral element.’ But, he concluded, ‘in the end, I think women, in consultation with their pastors, and doctors, and their family, are in a better position to make these decisions than some bureaucrats in Washington.’”
Jeffrey remarks, “That is like saying segregation has a ‘real moral element’ but in the end it should have been left up to the states, local communities and businesses.”
Apparently, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s church doesn’t use Scripture for moral guidance except to refer to tithing.
Gentlemen, may I point out that Jesus said, “Suffer little children: and forbid them not, to come unto me (alive); for of such is the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 19:14). Also, he said, “Thou shalt do no murder” (Matthew 19:18).
Relative to same-sex issues, Jeffrey quotes an open letter of February 28, from Obama to the “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Community” in which he states, “I support the complete repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act. As your president, I will use the bully pulpit to urge states to treat same-sex couples with full equality in their family and adoption laws.”
Obviously, these “Christian leaders” are not influenced by the Apostle Paul, when under the Holy Spirit, he writes this: “For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections; for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature. And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the women, burned in their lust toward one another” (Romans 1: 26 and 27a).
I can’t see how these scriptures (and, there are many others) could be any clearer and uncompromising on these issues, and as far as I can see, Obama and Clinton, who take the same position on these two issues, are jousting over economic direction and national safety while removing God’s protection by promoting murder and sodomy.
Of the 50 million killed since 1973, probably some 35 million would have been eligible to vote this year. Do you have any doubt as to which way they would vote on abortion and defense of marriage? The votes of the next 50 million are in our hands.
Typical of one saved from the assassins is Tim Tebow, All American-Heisman Trophy winner from the University of Florida, whom his mother’s physicians wanted to abort because of suspected defects.
It’s beyond my comprehension how black, white, brown or yellow Christians can throw Jesus under the bus and support the party of child-slaying and revere its candidates as messiahs of hope and change, when our only hope for change is to turn away from evil and Scripture-condemned actions.
The situation with Obama is artfully described by Hoover Institute member Thomas Sowell, a black scholar who wrote, “His voting record in the U.S. Senate is the furthest left of any senator. There is a remarkable consistency (far left) in what Obama has done over the years, despite inconsistencies in what he says.
“The irony is that Obama’s sudden rise politically, to the level of being a leading contender, has required him to project an entirely different persona. The ease with which he has accomplished this chameleon-like change, and entranced both white and black Democrats, is a tribute to the man’s talent and a warning about his reliability (emphasis mine).
The last thing our nation needs in these perilous times are window dummies pretending to be Christians, promising hope and change in meaningless chants that lack specifics or truth.
Referring to Obama, one pundit quoted the legendary George Burns on acting when he said, “Sincerity is everything. If you can fake that, you’ve got it made.”
I would expand that to include a large church crowd segment, who have thrown the Word under the bus in favor of their pocketbooks.
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God … And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us….” ( John 1: 1 and 14a).
So, you think that Kyoto was really about global warming
MARCH 28 – Columnist note: Let’s see. We’ve got the mayor of Orange County, the mayor of Orlando and the governor of Florida, and who knows how many other pols pushing this crazy “greenie” thing, which is not only certain to wreck our economy, but attack our freedoms as well. Thanks to a proven prophet named David Smith, I saw this coming 15 years ago. I can’t remember whether I repeated this prophesy since then, but it really can’t be repeated too often or discounted. The column headline on May 7, 1993, read, “Green as in Global, Gorby, Gore, Godless.”
I always admire people who can make a call years before, then have it come off exactly as predicted--and so off-the-wall in its details that it leaves you flabbergasted.
One such instance involves a man named David Smith, who is head of the Church of God Evangelistic Association and editor of Newswatch magazine. The secular world and some segments of the religious world dismiss him as a “conspiracy nut.”
Smith happens to have a weekly half-hour program on Christian television, and in June of 1991, he was making some comments regarding a recent economic crash of the iron curtain countries and the obvious upheaval approaching in what was then the Soviet Union. The coup against Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev was still two months away.
Noting that communism and socialism were now in disgrace as failed political, economical and philosophical systems, Smith predicted that the elaborate subversive apparatus they had assembled throughout the free world would move into the environmental movement and continue toward the goal of world domination through crippling regulations on industry and societies.
Being a “conspiracy nut” myself, I sat up as he said, “What was red, will now become green.”
Now, when a person who is a media darling with international stature does something with global consequences, it should appear on the network news. If it doesn’t, it’s a journalistic oversight, maybe. When, however, three such people participate in such an activity and receive this degree of non-coverage, then, it’s a conspiracy.
A miniscule, three-inch story on page 25 of TIME magazine had a small headline that stopped me cold: “From Red to Green.” Smith’s words of 23 months ago were now a reality.
Apparently, completely wrecking the environment of Eastern Europe and the USSR qualifies a person to be put in charge of an entity called the International Green Cross. Our old friend Gorbachev was made president of the “new environmental organization that hopes to do for man-made disasters what the Red Cross does for the natural kind.” I guess wars are now considered natural disasters.
The installation took place in Kyoto, Japan last week (makes sense) and included former United Nations Secretary-General Javier Perez de Cuellar (Peru) and Mother Theresa as Green Cross directors. Dan Rather, call your office.
Naturally, the support organization of all this is something called the “Global Forum of Spiritual and Parliamentary Leaders on Human Survival” from the Sodom on the Hudson, a.k.a. New York City.
A phone call there got me a voluminous fax with a lot of new age proposals and stated goals of wiping out consumerism and getting the human race to radically “change” its values.
A funding statement included the U.N., the governments of Canada, Finland, Holland, Norway and Sweden, and the Ford, Rockefeller and McArthur foundations (autos, oil, insurance and other such non-consumerism industries). Japan’s Center for Global Action was also listed. I thought World War II was over.
Gorby’s acceptance speech in Kyoto was pure socialism wrapped in environmental newspeak. A good example was, “Traditional forms of ideology (read democracy) including religious ideology (read Christianity) have not been able to unite the masses (Marx’s and Lenin’s favorite word--emphasis mine) of people in order to find a way out of the (environmental) crisis. Too often, modern nations (read United States) satisfying their selfish, narrow aims, undermine the global conditions of life on earth.”
Another release from the Kyoto Global Forum read like the Wicca Handbook for Witches in Training, concluding with, “We need to root us in enduring values and to connect us back to nature, the source of all our values.”
Now that Gorby is ensconced as Big Brother of all these “Spiritual and Parliamentary Leaders,” why do I feel so wary of all these greenhouse gasses coming from Kyoto and enveloping the tattered remnants of the U.S. Constitution.
Not surprisingly, at the bottom of a long list of Global Forum socialist big wigs is Executive Committee Member and Mr. Greenjeans himself, the “honorable” U.S. Vice President Albert Gore, in happy servitude as Big Red becomes Big Green for the Big Showdown.
David Smith, call my office.
“The first angel sounded, and there followed hail and fire mingled with blood, and they were cast upon the earth; and the third part of trees was burnt up. And all green grass was burnt up.” --Revelation 8: 7
How come ‘greenie’ popguns always beat big oil’s $billions?
MARCH 21 - Who has the most money to influence government policy; environmentalists (greenies) or petroleum companies? Who has the most money to buy public opinion through the media; greenies or the oil giants?
The answer is, of course, as obvious as the $100 plus price on a barrel of oil or the $3 plus price of gasoline at the pump.
And yet, when these ever-increasing burdens on the American people have obvious, readily available solutions in proven reserves in Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico, the greenies fire their popguns and win every battle with the pols.
Just last week, when Alaska’s U.S. Senators declared that the oil situation and our foreign dependence demanded a move into drilling in the ANWAR where at least 10 billion barrels are located, the greenies’ leaders opened up with their popguns in defense of the mosquito swarms and moose, and were sure of victory.
And, despite a Red China and Commie Cuba oil drilling partnership 50 miles off Key West in the Florida Straits, it looks like future years will see millions of tourists unable to afford the drive to our sacrosanct, pristine beaches, thanks to $5 a gallon gas.
Why? Because, of all the industrialized nations of the world, ours is the only one controlling oil exploration to such an extreme extent, by companies who actually taught the rest of the world how to do it and now, those students are leaving us in their rearview mirrors.
Ditto for natural gas drilling, atomic energy plants and automotive manufacturing.
Is this the result of an overwhelming desire of we free people to be green and hang the cost, or is it that the oil companies with their $trillions can’t buy political influence or public opinion? Yeah, sure.
Or, is it that they are paying to guarantee shortage of a high demand product, justifying spiraling, zooming prices from foreign suppliers and their own wells?
Please notice how our pols are always screaming about obscene oil and gasoline profits and threatening to confiscate those profits, but it never happens? Can anyone say, ‘smoke screen’”?
In order to accept the oil depletion story, we must be made to believe that oil is a fossil fuel; I.e., the multi-million-year accumulation of animal and vegetable remains and thus, eventually exhaustible. Supposedly, these organic remains (fossils) were buried by deposits of soil in an oxygen free environment and over eons of time, became oil.
I always had a problem with this, when you consider the trillions of animals and zillion tons of vegetation required for such a slow process over infinite amounts of time; especially to form huge oil deposits widely scattered beneath the earth’s surface. It’s truly a fantasy mostly designed to support the theory of evolution. Far fetched would not be an unreasonable tag.
Associate Editor Gary Stearman of Prophecy In The News magazine wrote an article in the March issue titled “And God Created Oil…” in which he relates that scientists, based on new observations in recent years, are credibly advancing the theory that oil is constantly being manufactured by natural processes deep within the earth and is not a fossil (animal-vegetable) fuel.
Considers that trees (wood) were the only source of energy for heat and cooking for thousands of years, as well as still being that same prime source in Africa and large areas of Asia, and keeps on renewing itself. Before oil, coal fired the industrial revolution of the 19th and 20th centuries, and prior to Edwin Drake drilling the first oil well in Pennsylvania in 1859, the big fear was that coal supplies would run out, and yet, they are still going on endlessly, even though the world population has gone from one billion to 6.5 billion since coal was discovered.
Stearman’s article describes a discovery in the North Atlantic “where deep sea explorers found a field of volcanic vents that formed beautiful, white carbonate towers between 50 and 200 feet in height. They named the area ‘Lost City’”.
“A group of scientists, headed by Giora Proskurowski of the University of Washington, have published their findings in the prestigious academic journal, Science.
“Published on February 1, 2008, it is titled “Abiogenic Hydrocarbon Production at Lost City Hydrothermal Field”.
The Science article asserts that oil is being produced by mineral (not animal or vegetable) processes. “Oil is apparently being continuously manufactured.” Additionally, Stearman relates that European scientists observed this abiotic production of hydrocarbons (the basis of oil) on one of Saturn’s moons, named Titan; no animals or vegetation there.
And speaking of European scientists, it was common knowledge that Germany had plenty of coal but not much oil for their World War II adventure. They used a process of converting coal to fuels that, by 1944, was producing 6.5 million tons of liquid fuels per year, mostly gasoline, for their war machine. Please notice they didn’t use food supplies, corn, etc.,, but coal. Aren’t there starving billions across the globe who need this corn?
The article is too extensive for total coverage here, but it does point out that under “Creationism” , the end of a fossil fuel oil would not be in the plan of a loving God and that “new evidence suggests that oil and gas are being produced in mass quantities by a synthetic process … and will continue to be long after the Kingdom has been established.”
“And of Asher he said, Let Asher be blessed with children; let him be acceptable to his brethren, and let him dip his foot in oil.” Deuteronomy 33:24.
"World to U.S. --World to U.S.--Come in--It's the Taxes, stupid!"
MARCH 7 - Most of the world is going in a different direction from the United States, and I don't mean politically, except that it's in the direction of Reaganomics 2.0, as detailed in the February issue of The American Spectator.
Nothing proves the sheer selfishness and power-mongering of our political class more than their position on personal and corporate taxes despite what is occurring around the world in formerly dead, dying and hopeless economies.
Arthur Laffer is president of the financial firm Laffer Associates, and Stephen Moore is senior economics writer for the Wall Street Journal editorial page. In summarizing the effect of Reaganomics 2.0 from January 1, 1982, through January 2007, they point out that in the U.S., 48.5 million jobs were created (some 100,000 per month for 27 years) versus 24 million for Europe, with a larger population. Did the world notice this? You bet they did, even though our politicians on the left, and some on the right, seem oblivious to this miracle and still fight against tax reductions with all the false rhetoric they can muster.
Typical is Poland, which is dropping most taxes and will have a flat tax of 15 percent by next year. And Bulgaria (Yes, I said Bulgaria) has already instituted a 10 percent flat tax.
The former big boys of global communism, Russia and China, weren't dozing either, eliminating death taxes and going to low flat taxes to inspire unprecedented economic growth and living standards.
Laffer and Moore point out that "under Reagan, U.S. tax rates went from 70 to 28 percent and the inflation rate from 13 percent to 3 percent. About $1.5 trillion more in investment came into the U.S than left, from 1982 to 2002. That meant two decades of new factories, technological investment, low-priced imports and rising wages and living standards."
Another bonus was the doubling of federal revenues during Reagan’s terms.
With Sweden (the socialists' dreamland) and Russia eliminating estate taxes, but America taxing death at 45 percent, they ask, "What's wrong with this picture?"
It's obvious that the overwhelming success of Reaganomics frightened the rest of the world out of their wits. When countries saw the end of several decades of economic up-and-down and mediocrity in liberal-led U.S. domestic policy, the napping giant had woken up.
Coupled with the demise of the Soviet Union and the flood of worldwide information via the internet and satellite media transmission, most of the world's leaders realized the jig was up if they let the gap between themselves and the U.S. continue to widen. Not surprising, was Red China's and India's gallop into the 21st century where, the United Nations reports, much of the globe's massive poverty reduction has occurred as a result of their moves to lower taxes, open markets and capitalism. Cited in The Spectator was a WSJ article from 1997 entitled "The Great Tax Cut of China" that had generated an average 10 percent real growth annually for 19 years, attributing this "incredible performance to massive sustained tax reduction." Moving from the massive to the microscopic, they cite Iceland, where tax slashes and the resultant move to privatized industry made the economy soar, the inflation rate fall from 100 percent per annum to 3 percent, and itsy-bitsy Iceland (population 300,000) went from one of the poorest countries in Europe to one of the richest in less than a decade.
And, back to Russia, where the 13 percent flat tax initiated by Vladimir Putin's regime is generating more revenue for the government than the old confiscatory rate of over 50 percent.
It's more than obvious that Democrat candidates at all levels, led by socialists Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama, want to move in the opposite direction from these soaring followers of Reaganomics around the world. Does it matter to them that Germany has slashed its
52 percent top corporate income tax down to 19.8 percent? No, it doesn't. And, for that, coupled with the rest of the above, the probability of them getting your vote should spiral down to zero percent. That goes for all the R.I.N.O.s (Republicans In Name Only) as well. Space does not allow detailing all the other exemplary governments who are prospering from some
version of Reaganomics--Spain, Singapore, Hong Kong, Ireland, Scotland, Northern Ireland, etc. The winner of the Vietnam War has finally been decided - CAPITALISM. They want to attract foreign investment.
Holding out through all this has been Castro's Cuba where wages average $12 a month and U.S cars from the 1950s are horse drawn. Venezuela's leader idiot, Hugo Chavez, believes his oil reserves can save him in the quest for his rerun version of the Cuban nightmare. Hugo, think Soviet Union with 50+ billion barrels of crude oil reserves. You're probably getting close to that with 64 billion barrels back in 1996.
The message to Americans couldn't be clearer. While the genius of our 40th U.S. President is being employed by the rest of the world to strip us of our leadership role, our so-called representatives ignore Reagan's words and follow the lead of Hugo Chavez and his ilk, on the road to mediocrity at best, disaster at worst. We really have just one recourse on the only issue that will matter. Time for talking is over. "Turn the rascals out!"
"Speak not in the ears of a fool: for he will despise the wisdom of thy words." --Proverbs 23: 9.
We'll Never Fix Education If We Don't Stop “Monkeying” With It
FEBRUARY 15 - The local metropolitan daily stated that Florida's public schools could have a lot of empty seats next year, if the State Board of Education votes on February 19 to adopt controversial science
standards requiring teaching only Darwin's theory of evolution in the state's public schools.
Private schools everywhere are licking their chops. The rationale (?) they are using, that evolution is one of the 18 "big ideas" students must understand by graduation time, is an obvious reach by the
secularists trying to foist this "theory" as a law of science or even as a scientific area. One doesn't have to be a scientist to know that Galileo's telescopic, repetitious (Emphasis mine) observations of the movements of the planets in relation to the sun, led to the indisputable fact that the sun was the center of our solar system and that the other bodies revolved around it, and not vice-versa. Incidentally this was some three centuries before Darwin postulated his "theory." Ditto for Sir Isaac Newton's (1642-1726) repeat observations of falling apples that led to the "Law of Gravity". Neither of these brilliant men, nor the thousands of others who preceded or came after Darwin's mid-19th century "Theory of Evolution", needed it for their invaluable contributions to real science. For anyone to state that this is one of the "18 big ideas that today's students must understand by graduation time" is simply an attempt to cut off
Creationism and Intelligent Design from analysis by young developing minds.
I can remember when I was a young developing high school graduate, who had studied physics, algebra, geometry, biology, etc., as well as history, English, Latin and two foreign languages; the furthest thing from my intellectual needs and further development levels was Darwin's "theory." The daily doesn't say specifically who at the State Board of Education made the "big ideas" statement, but it continued in the claim that that "evolution is the fundamental concept underlying all of biology, supported by multi-forms of scientific evidence." In reality, ever since Darwin's supposition, thousands of scientists have denounced evolution as a claim that could never be proven by repeatable observation (the scientific method), and this has not changed. It is still just a theory.
In the February issue of The American Spectator, Senior Editor Tom Bethel reviews a new documentary film release due in April, wherein writer, actor, pundit, economist, lecturer and lawyer Ben Stein interviews leading proponents and opponents of Darwinism worldwide. The film, "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed," Bethel writes, is about "scientists and researchers who acknowledge the evidence for the intelligent design of life and who have been ostracized or denied tenure as a result. In a word, they have been 'expelled' from the academy." In addition to scientific proponents of Intelligent
Design and Creationism, Stein interviews the leading opponents led by Oxford's famed Richard Dawkins, and he admits to Stein that science knows nothing about the origins of life and that, yes, Darwinism is
antithetical to religion. But, he allows that if life was designed, it was done by intelligent beings
elsewhere in the cosmos, who evolved by naturalistic means and, somehow, transported their design to Earth. Holy Milky Way cow!! These guys will go to any length to deny the existence of God or the truth of His Word. Why don't they just admit that despite more than 100 years of digging and moving millions of tons of dirt, sand, rocks, etc., no transitional fossil of animal to human has ever been found; although, a number of them have been faked by desperate "scientists"--beginning with the "Peking Man" early in the 20th century.
An even bigger nonsensical claim by the state board members in support of the Darwin "Sci-Fi" work (please remember that this era was at the beginning of the novel appearing in European literature) that not teaching this as the only truth, is the reason Florida is falling behind the rest of the nation and world in science testing and technology. What nonsense! I am holding in my "formerly
nicotine-stained fingers" a tremendous volume by Dr, Walt Brown titled In the Beginning - Compelling
Evidence for Creation and the Flood (seventh edition). Dr. Brown has a Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), where he was a National Science Foundation Fellow, and he is a West Point graduate and retired Air Force Colonel who has taught college courses in physics, mathematics and computer science. He is also a former Army ranger and paratrooper. Other military assignments included these: Director of Benet Research, Development, and Engineering Laboratories in
Albany, N.Y.; tenured associate professor at the Air Force Academy; and Chief of Science and Technology Studies at the Air War College. Dr. Brown presents hard evidence in direct transcripts
from the works of over 100 leading scientists on most of the major aspects of the origins of life and proof
of the flood and its aftermath. To quote Dr. Brown from his Introduction: "Yes, today,
evolutionists generally control education, science journals and the media, but the scientific evidence
overwhelmingly supports creation and a global flood." I would strongly suggest to the State Board of
Education do the following: 1. Read Dr. Brown's book. 2. See Ben Stein's documentary. 3. Don't vote on this until you do. Education in Florida has enough problems.
"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and four-footed beasts,
and creeping things." --Romans 1:22 & 23.
His name may be Kennedy, but that’s where it ends
FEBRUARY 1 – Well, Barack Hussein Obama got the endorsement of the second-longest serving U.S. Senator (46 years) when Teddy “Bare” Kennedy sniffed the wind after the South Carolina primary.
What he obviously smelled in the 55 percent Obama victory, which was more than the combined total of Hillary and Edwards, was a seismic shift in the Democrat Party away from “Clintonamania” , to race and gender based voting motives.
Let’s face it, the guy who rode his older brother’s presidential coat tails into a senate seat at age 30 in 1962, certainly isn’t abandoning the Clinton machine on a long shot guess.
My own assessment is that he is positioning himself for a possible Obama win as candidate for president, while quietly assuring the Clintons that he will campaign vigorously for her, with some hefty financial contributions as well, if she should pull it out.
As he did at Chappaquidick, a walk, a swim and a few hours of phoning while Mary Jo Kopechne was sinking in the car, got him a slap on the wrist and the second-longest Senate seat in modern history; only exceeded, incidentally, by Robert “KKK” Byrd of West Virginia (50 years). You can bet, he’s pre-arranged the slap on the wrist from the Clintons if Hillary prevails.
Teddy “Bare” hasn’t differed his modus operandi that much since I was a student at Harvard with him in the early 1950s. Actually, he started two years ahead of me, but when he paid a fellow classmate to take a French exam for him, and got caught, Harvard made him take a two-year leave-of-absence in the Army (wrist slap). Consequently, he did his last two years in conjunction with mine.
After observing Ted’s machinations for more than a half-century, I would surmise that, as he enters his 46th year in the Senate, the man who failed so miserably in following his brother’s footsteps to the presidency, is either thinking of retirement or maybe a glamorous finish in an ambassador job like his father. Joseph Kennedy, after all, was Roosevelt’s ambassador to England during the run-up to World War II, 1937-1940. The oldest son, Joe Jr., who was the father’s choice for president, was killed in the war.
And, brother Robert was well on his way to the Democrat nomination for president when he was assassinated in Los Angeles in 1968, the day he won the primary there.
Always the bet-hedger, Ted made sure that in his endorsement of Obama, he included a pledge of full support to whomever of the candidates eventually got the nomination.
When it comes to character and resolve, the differences between these brothers are monumental. In ocean adventures, Ted’s history of a sinking Oldsmobile off Martha’s Vineyard can’t compare to JFK’s wartime exploits in the Pacific as the PT109 commander. And, there’s nothing in his background that equals Bobby Kennedy’s roles as head counsel for Sen. Joe McCarthy in the hearings on communist infiltration, or his stint as JFK’s attorney general, when he sent labor leader Jimmy Hoffa to prison for three years.
By today’s standards of political philosophy, both of Ted’s older brothers would fit the criteria of Republican leaders without changing a thing. Both Ronald Reagan and George Bush learned from JFK that tax cuts increase the amount of federal revenue by huge amounts and in his words, “ arising tide, lifts all boats.”
In his endorsement of Barack Hussein Obama (Ted once referred to him as bin-Laden), the senior senator from Massachusetts has declared himself an opponent of the war on terror, opening the door for more 9/11 type attacks, and a proponent of immediate, announced withdrawal from battle with al-Qeada on their turf.
Contrast this wobbly-kneed condition with JFK’s firm resolve in the Cold War and facing off against Nikita Krushchev’s wild Cuban missile crisis. Equally as tragic, this endorsement brings the Chappaquidick Chump down squarely on the side of abortion and the continued slaughter of the unborn in the U.S., now closing in on the 50 million mark. Oh, well. Like the 9/11 victims, they’re just defenseless Americans – only more so.
Although, I’m almost sure that JFK would never have approved of unrestricted abortion chambers, I’m positive that Bobby and wife Ethel, with their large family and solid values, would have opposed this murder of the unborn with the same vigor he used in pursuit of corruption in the labor movement.
In thinking back over the past 46 years, the only thing I can attribute to Teddy is the enormous mess called the “The Big Dig” in Boston, where gigantic corruption and incompetence of oversight increased the original budget from $2.5 billion to $15 billion, with the federal share going from $2 billion to $12 billion for a still leaking, deadly tunnel.
Possibly, we can look forward with anxiety to this endorsement of bin-Laden (oops) Obama as Big Dig II – America’s Grave.
I wonder who Mary Jo Kopechne would endorse?
“As a dog returneth to his vomit, so a fool returneth to his folly. Seest thou a man wise in his own conceit? There is more hope of a fool than of him.” Proverbs 26:11 and 12.
Martin Luther King knew who Ed Brooke was, but do you?
JANUARY 25 - Columnist’s note: This week our nation honored the late Martin Luther King Jr. Preceding Dr. King, my black-American hero was a man who became the first U.S. Senator since Reconstruction, and who has been ignored ever since, primarily because of his party affiliation. I recently had a conversation with a gentleman in his mid-40s, well educated, who had never heard of Senator Ed Brooke of Massachusetts, a Republican. I would wager that 99 percent of Americans under 45 also have never heard of U.S. Senator Ed Brooke. Think this has anything to do with the education system or the pre-Internet, liberal controlled media? In honor of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day, I am repeating a column I wrote April 8, 1994 titled, "Those who like to create racial voting districts should study former U.S. Senator Ed Brooke.” I remember in my hunting days, the rule was, 'If you get lost in the woods, always backtrack first'.
"There is a lot of hullabaloo taking place in the courts regarding the shape and makeup of certain Congressional districts which have been gerrymandered to create racial majorities and guarantee the election of minority candidates. The United States Supreme Court will rule on this soon as a result of lawsuits brought in Louisiana and North Carolina. Another suit has been brought in Florida concerning the third district. Shaped like a fishhook, District 3 wanders from Jacksonville to Orlando through several counties, zigging and zagging, and widening in order to literally vacuum up black population centers in a 170-mile meandering corridor.
For a guy who voted for black American Ed Brooke to be the U.S. senator from Massachusetts some 28 years ago and state attorney general before that, I have a hard time with rigged elections for people who are not excellent enough to win the voters' confidence on their own merits.
You'll never convince me that the people of Massachusetts were so enlightened that long ago, or that Brooke, a Republican running in a state two-to-one deep in registered Democrats, didn’t win the attorney general and Senate seats based on his character and abilities. That's why, when I got this news release from U.S. Rep. Corrine Brown's "five office" dominion, talking about the "civil rights crisis in the 90s," the sheer demagoguery of the language was beyond contempt, for me. "Rev. Jesse Jackson joins U.S. Representative Corrine Brown in Jacksonville today. The Civil Rights struggle continues," the headline ranted. Naturally, when you cross one demagogue with another, the result is sheer lunacy. According to Brown, the new districts were drawn to correct years of violations of the Voting Rights Act throughout the South. And, here I thought all these years that gerrymandering districts was to give one political party an unfair advantage over another. But then, history, according to Jesse and Corinne, is just a lump of crazy dough to be reshaped according to whim and the necessities of propaganda.
I read a lot of material and releases during Black History Month, but I didn't ever recall seeing a word about Senator Ed Brooke of Massachusetts. Black leaders, who make a nice living out of the "Civil Rights struggle" don't like Brooke all that much.
After all, here was a black man elected attorney general of a major northeastern state even before the civil rights bill of 1965, and in 1966, the first black U.S. Senator since Reconstruction. He was also a Republican and a conservative who believed in traditional values.
Ed Brooke made it the hard way, convincing the electorate of an entire state that he should be their senator. He was well educated (hard work, articulate (hard work), sincere (sacrifice), and had a genuine, million dollar smile.
Of course, Brooke didn't have all the advantages that Jackson likes to see garnered in great quantities for minorities: welfare, affirmative action, quotas, sex education, free condoms, alternative sex styles, abortions, public housing, and all the other "Federal Plantation" goodies that create obedient robots ... all the things Brooke opposed.
The news release from Brown's office announced that Jacksonville meeting as a commemoration of the 26th anniversary of the assassination of Dr. King with the Rev. Jackson remarks addressing the civil rights crisis of the 1990s ... the court challenges of redistricting.
The question is, did King give his life for Rep. Brown's concept of elections, representation and achievement, or for those of Senator Ed Brooke?"
"For from the least of them even unto the greatest of them, everyone is given to covetousness: and from the prophet to the priest everyone dealeth falsely." Jeremiah 6:13.
Quick ‘change’ champs obviously see us as chumps
JANUARY 11 – Most people regard the term “chump change’ as defining a small amount of money compared to a generous amount. In terms of the Democrats’ leading contenders in the presidential primaries, if you believe that these socialists can bring change that would improve your safety, prosperity and health, without further ruining our nation, you are a “chump” Remember, Stalin, Mao and Castro, just to name a few, brought dramatic “change” while over 100 million died, and more are still dying or suffering from the changes they foisted on their countries and others. Typical of this change “thingee” are virtually all African nations and some Latin American nations like Venezuela, where Hugo Chavez’s drive toward socialism has slashed the per capita gross domestic product from $9,300 in 1997 to $5,800 in 2004, and still falling – this despite proven oil reserves that are among the world’s largest.
During the past half-century, America’s most successful presidents for the economy and safety of both citizens and military, have been Republicans who were anti-socialist and anti-communist, beginning with Eisenhower, then Nixon, Reagan, Bush I, and Bush II. The worst economically was Jimmie “The Wimp” Carter with 22 percent first mortgage rates, 10+ percent unemployment and 12 percent annual inflation.
Between Korea and Vietnam, Dems Truman and Johnson had over 80,000 battle deaths combined..
The unending liberal media push for a recession has not worked, even in the face of a flood of illegals, a war on terror and a slowed real estate market that is
still miles ahead of the Carter Cave-in.
But, as economist Larry Kudlow states, “The Bush boom just celebrated its sixth anniversary. The current expansion is now in its 74th month – 17 months larger than the average 57-month business cycle since World War II.
“The latest job report says that America is still working, with 94,000 new corporate payrolls in November and a rolling average of 103,000 job increases for the past three months. Even the household job count, which picks up small businesses, surged 609,000 in November, with a 303,000 average gain over the past three months.”
Kudlow adds,” University of Michigan Professor Mark Perry reports that household wealth has increased 43 percent in the past five years, despite $100 oil, $3
gasoline and sub-prime mortgage infections.”
Isn’t it absolutely amazing what a Harvard Business School degree and a tax cut can do?!!!
So, the liberal push polls say you want Barack Hussein Obama or Hillary Rodham Clinton, with their non-existent economic backgrounds, to “change” the
Bush Boom? To turn tax cut generated record federal revenues back to your having empty pockets and increased deficits for the government? Being able to
get fat book deals for oneself does not a president make.
On the wall above my desk, I keep a picture of the second jet-liner about to crash into the World Trade Center on 9/11, as the first building hit belches fire
and smoke just prior to collapsing. I’m sure our socialist “quick change artists” will “change” the zero homeland casualty figure achieved since that fateful day with the awarding of U.S. Constitutional rights to all terrorists here and abroad, while abandoning the war on terror that keeps them pinned down on their own turf. Can you just imagine Barack Hussein Obama, who was always against bringing the fight to the enemy after the 2001 version of Pearl Harbor, being able to protect us from these murderous maniacs and their suicide bomber approach. Sorry, Barack Hussein, legal briefs just won’t cut it. Just picture “ Silly Hillie”, who didn’t even have the courage to leave the biggest serial lover since Casanova, holding the job and duties of a wartime commander-in-chief. Anyone remember the Balkans Bungle or the Haiti Hooplah?
And, guess what president and “adviser” (buy one, get one free) spent eight years slashing their “loathed” military, so that today’s reserves and national guards have to do multiple tours now in the Mid-east? Frankly, if I were a woman, the worst thing I would want is “ Silly Hillie” as our first woman president. This loser is no Margaret Thatcher or Indira Ghandi, and will, without a doubt, be manipulated by the “First Ladies Man”, Slick Willie, to her eventual failure and disgrace.
The biggest farce of all these quick-change artists is ignoring the fact that today’s presidents can’t really do anything except gauge the winds and try to steer the ship of state on a reasonably safe and prosperous course. The mechanics of drastic change and presidential power to do so was kidnapped by the Legislative Branch early in the last century. Prior to 1913, the Constitution mandated that U.S. Senators be elected by the members of their state’s legislature. The wisdom of the founding fathers was hijacked to be replaced with the direct popular elections that can run to over $20-30 million in some larger states. And, money, instead of peer assessment and respect, guarantees us mediocre and incompetent U.S. Senators for lifetime terms. A year later, supposedly with the ratification of two-thirds of the states, the Income Tax was foisted upon our backs in an open-ended mess that now consumes over 40,000 pages of law.
Then, in 1929, when the stock market crash had everyone’s mind clouded with fear, another Congressional hammer fell with the limiting of House Representatives to 435 members. Where prior constitutional limits were one per 30,000 population, we now have one rep per 700,000 and growing toward one million people districts. Amnesty for illegals, anyone?
We call them representatives and senators. They used to call them barons and dukes. Anyone running on a platform of “Change”, claiming major changes can be accomplished in anything less than a generation, without a socialist or communist revolution, is just assuming we are chumps.
“A prudent man concealeth knowledge; but the heart of fools proclaimeth foolishness.”
Proverbs 12: 23.
When fallen soldiers speak, everyone should listen
JANUARY 4 - Columnist note: I am relinquishing this space to one of our fallen soldiers, Sgt. Eddie Jeffers, age 22, who died in Iraq, September 19, 2007. A loving husband, brother, son and talented writer, his words should be read by all Americans. If they don’t touch your heart, you haven’t got one. If you don’t see the truth in them, you don’t know what truth is. And, if they don’t make you proud to be an American, you’re living a lie in the wrong country. Eddie titled his piece, Hope Rides Alone.
“I stare out into the darkness from my post, and I watch the city burn to the ground. I smell the familiar smells, I walk through the familiar rubble, and I look at the frightened faces that watch me pass down the streets of their neighborhoods. My nerves hardly rest; yet, my hands are steady on the device that has been given to me from my
government for the purpose of taking the lives of others.
I sweat and I am tired. My back aches from the loads I carry. Young American boys look to me to direct them in a manner that will someday allow them to see their families again…and yet, I too, am just a boy…my age not but a few years more than of the ones I lead. I am stressed, I am scared, and I am paranoid…because death is everywhere. It waits for me, it calls to me from around street corners and windows, and it is always there.
And to think, I volunteered for this. And, I am ignorant to the rest of the world, or so I thought. But, even thousands of miles away in Ramadi, Iraq, the cries and complaints of the ungrateful reach me.
In a year, I will be thrust back into society from a life and mentality that doesn’t fit your average man. And then, I will be alone. And then, I will walk down the streets of America, and see the yellow ribbon stickers on the cars of the same people who compare our President to Hitler.
I will watch the television and see the Cindy Sheehans and the Al Frankens, and the rest of the ignorant sheep of America, spout off their mouths about a subject they know nothing about. It is their right, however, and it is a right that is defended by hundreds of thousands of boys and girls scattered across the world, far from home. I use the words boys and girls, because that’s what they are. In the Army, the average age of the infantryman is 19. The average rank of soldiers killed in action is Private First Class.
People like Cindy Sheehan are ignorant. Not just to this war, but to the results of their idiotic ramblings, or at least, I hope they are. They don’t realize its affects on this war. In the war, there are no Geneva Conventions, no cease-fires. Medics and chaplains are not spared the enemy’s brutality because it’s against the rule. I can only imagine the horrors a chaplain would experience at the hands of the enemy. The enemy slinks in the shadows and fights a coward’s war against us.
It is effective, though, as many have died since the start of this war. And, the memory of their service to America is tainted by the inconsiderate remarks on our nation’s news outlets. And, every day the enemy changes. Only now, the enemy is transitioning from Muslim extremists to Americans. The enemy is becoming the very people whom we defend with our lives. And, they do not realize it.
But, in denouncing our actions, our leaders, the war we live and fight, they are isolating the military from society… and, they are becoming our enemy.
Democrats and peace activists like to toss the word ”quagmire” around and compare this war to Vietnam. In a way, they are right, this war is becoming like Vietnam.
Not the actual war, but in the isolation of country and military. America is not a nation at war; they are a nation with its military at war. Like it or not, we are here; some of us for our second or third time; some even for their fourth. Americans are now so concerned with politics, that it is interfering with our war.
Terrorists cut the heads off of American citizens on the Internet, and there is no outrage. But, an American soldier kills and Iraqi in the midst of battle, and there are investigations, and, sometimes, soldiers are even jailed … for doing their job.
It is absolutely sickening to me to think that our country has come to this. Why are we so obsessed with bad news? Why will people stop at nothing to be against this war, no matter how much evidence of the good we have done is thrown in their faces?
When is the last time CNN or MSNBC or CBS reported the opening of schools and hospitals in Iraq? Or the leaders of terror cells being detained or killed?
It’s all happening, but people will not let up their hatred of President Bush. They will ignore the good news, because it just might show people that he was right. America has lost its will to fight. It has lost its will to defend what is right and just in the world. The craziest thing of all is that the American people have not even been asked to sacrifice a single thing. It’s not like World War II, where people rationed food, gasoline and turned in cars to made into metal for tanks. Unless, you are in the military or the family member of one serving, it’s life as usual … the war doesn’t affect you.
But, it affects us. And, when it’s over and the troops come home and they try to piece together what’s left of their lives, where will the detractors be then? Where will the Cindy Sheehans be to and talk to soldiers and help them sort out the last couple of years of their lives? … most of which was spent dodging death and wading through the death
of their friends.
We are the hope of the Iraqi people. They want a country that is safe to raise their children in. Not a place where their children will be abducted, raped and murdered if they don’t comply with terrorists’ demands. They want to live on, rebuild and prosper. And, America has given them the opportunity, but only if we stay true to the cause, and see it
to its end. But, the country must unite in this endeavor. We cannot place the burden on our military alone.
Right now, the burden is all on the American soldiers. Right now, hope rides alone. But, it can change… it must change. Because, there is only failure and darkness ahead for us as a country, as a people, if it doesn’t. Let’s stop all the political nonsense, let’s stop all the bickering, let’s stop all the bad news. And, let’s stand and fight.”
“Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.”
John 15:13.
Sergeant Edmund John Jeffers – R.I.P.
